ios-personmd-notifications md-help-circle

Profile

  • Guest
    medal 0
  • Posts: 21
  • Post Likes: 3765

Notifications

  • No Unread Notifications

Suggested
Development, NEW Suppliers system Poll, VOTE.!

Allow new suppliers with +10% to take design past 100?

69.86% (51)
Yes, allow design at 100 with +10% taking design above 100
30.14% (22)
No , keep it as is now where once you get design points to 100 the supplier +1 doesn’t count so stays at just 100
warning
This thread is closed. Threads older than 6 weeks are closed automatically. To continue this discussion, create a new thread.
angle-double-left ios-arrow-back 1 ios-arrow-forward angle-double-right
medal 5079
6 years 110 days ago (edited 6 years 109 days ago)
Poll for developers new suppliers system advised by them to run this poll.

My personal opinion is that it SHOULD go past 100 points design system.

For example if u get acceleration to 100 in design points you should then get the +10% added on top of the 100 so you have a theoretical acceleration greater than 100, otherwise suppliers become obsolete during 2nd half of season if it just stays as 100 despite the acceleration supplier given 10% more etc
md-quotelink
medal 5000
6 years 110 days ago
I just voted no when I meant to press Yes :)
md-quotelink
medal 5000
6 years 109 days ago
Ali
I just voted no when I meant to press Yes :)


lol :)
md-quotelink
medal 5000
6 years 109 days ago
No because this will lead back to only certain suppliers being "the best". Now if you have to sign a season long contract and you need certain rep (or finish above a certain position last season) to get certain suppliers, then maybe I'm ok with the idea of going over the 100 cap
md-quotelink
medal 5000
6 years 107 days ago
The new supplier launch could be a great opportunity to overhaul the whole system. I think it would be great if the performance bonuses were rerolled each season, meaning you would have to renegotiate contracts rather than just choose them once then ignore them forever as I do now.

I also quite like the idea of variable length contracts. Maybe with a discount if you agree to a longer term contract but with a penalty if you terminate early.

The same points go for sponsors too. I hate the fact that both are on a fixed 10 race term and both renew at the same time.
md-quotelink
medal 5079
6 years 95 days ago
Seems pretty conclusive 80% Vs 20%
md-quotelink
medal 5000
6 years 95 days ago
Gary
Seems pretty conclusive 80% Vs 20%


Oh yeah... I mean thousands of people played this game before it became an app and the Android app alone has half a million downloads. But 48 responses is the overwhelming voice of the people.../sarcasm
md-quotelink
medal 5079
6 years 95 days ago
Greg
Gary
Seems pretty conclusive 80% Vs 20%


Oh yeah... I mean thousands of people played this game before it became an app and the Android app alone has half a million downloads. But 48 responses is the overwhelming voice of the people.../sarcasm



Can only go by what people vote not my problem if no1 else is bothered either way, i bumped it up probably 10 times over last 2 weeks......deal with it. :p
md-quotelink
medal 4992 Moderator
6 years 95 days ago
Problem is I can't vote because neither of the option applies to my opinion. Suppliers giving 10% bonus would be way too much, if it's meant to be 10% bonus for each supplier that is. But I do think the supplier bonus should count even if you bring the stat to 100, so 100 +1 bonus counts as 101.
md-quotelink
medal 5000
6 years 84 days ago
i vote no, for the simple fact is that implimenting this system would be making the game unfair and biased towards more seasoned players, and i think the devs would agree with me on this one because they have strived fro the very start of the creation of this game to keep it fair and equal
md-quotelink
angle-double-left ios-arrow-back 1 ios-arrow-forward angle-double-right

You must be logged in to post a reply.