Jean Martin medal 5000 6 years 249 days ago
I propose it:
Murk: +10 in acceleration / -6 fuel economy 500k per race
Cosurworthit: +7 in acceleration / -3 fuel economy 300k per race
Toymotor: +7 in acceleration / -3 fuel economy 300k per race
Rednote: +8 in acceleration / -4 fuel economy 400k per race
Wonder: +7 in acceleration / -3 fuel economy 300k per race
Tifosi: +10 in acceleration / -6 fuel economy 500k per race
I think that's more logical
Kevin Bissell medal 5000 Super Mod 6 years 248 days ago
Not really logical at all in my opinion. You have 2 engine suppliers +10 acc -6 fuel, 1 supplier +8 acc -4 fuel and 3 suppliers +7 acc -3 fuel.
With those stats logically you only need 3 engine suppliers.
Frank Thomas medal 4987 Moderator 6 years 248 days ago
Plus every single one is sacrificing Fuel Efficiency for an Acceleration bonus. With that I only need two suppliers, one for the most bonus, which in my eyes isn't that attractive because it sacrifices more FE for no larger bonus gap at higher costs, and the one with the least malus and costs.
Yunus Unia Blunion medal 5176 6 years 242 days ago
This isn't a good idea, as pointed out by Kevin and Frank.
Jacob Smith medal 5000 6 years 232 days ago
It would be cool if we could manage all the different components of the engine, maybe even implement the real engine rules. I know it would be hard but it would make the game much more exciting... more to think about
James Harris medal 5000 6 years 232 days ago
That's a cool idea. It would definitely be great if we could determine how much fuel economy we wanted to sacrifice for speed. These are decisions made by real F1 teams.
Also, what if engine manufacturers were made of users who voted on the engine's attributes? It could open new possibilities.
Jacob Smith medal 5000 6 years 232 days ago
It would also make the cooling stat actually relevent
