Daniel Lyons medal 5000 3 years 359 days ago
We need sponser targets to be way for relistic as at the moment it's way to random. An example of this was i was in my first season in elite and at the back, got one good results but in the next race my sponser objective 7 places than i have finished all season.
Basically the game punishes you for having good results which isnt how it should work
Chris Py medal 5000 3 years 359 days ago
I sort of agree but remember that it works the same for everyone so in the long run it should even out. It is extremely frustrating when you get too high goals..
Victor Torya medal 4831 3 years 355 days ago
As far as I know, the goals are readjusted according to the results of the races. Here's a solution ... look at your sponsors and choose the ones that will provide the highest income and the lowest bonuses. This will make you receive accessible goals.
Dan Tyler medal 5000 3 years 354 days ago
it should be set from the start of the sponsor duration.
if you pick it and it says top 10 then no matter how well your doing you should get rewards for all top 10 finishes, it should not change race to race, they do not pay you more for exceeding it why should they make it harder.
Richard Herman medal 5000 3 years 354 days ago
It should be determined by:
- Your last result at that track.
- Your last race overall.
- Point standings in league.
- Reputation.
This would be ordered and the person with the best of above would need to finish 1st, Next best 2nd, etc.
Frank Thomas medal 4855 Moderator 3 years 354 days ago
Last result at that track wouldn't work, especially if it's a high ranked criteria, as it can be from months back and even if it's last season it can be different league or tier.
Last race overall is currently the main source, but currently too powerful.
Your current league position is a good suggestion, at least after 3+ races it gives a good picture what can be expected. For the first races last season can be used, if same tier. Promotees can start with 'Finish race' in any case and Top3 for relegated teams should be OK also.
For the purpose to provide a reality check would be level difference, as this directly influences how easy it is to have a competitive car, the max power of your tech and, up to level 15, more or less the strength of the driver.
Reputation, in relation to the tier average and other managers, it sort of makes sense that Sponsors would look at it. It could replace league position and level, but league switching could mean both an easy or grim time in terms of sponsor bonus until reputation normalised to the new semi-closed system of the new league.
In case it could be more quickly done than reworking the goal mechanics the sponsors could be divided by a demanding stat. The highest bonus paying main sponsor of each token group gets a high and goal stays as it is. The next are mediocre and all it does is taking the current goal adding a +1 and +2 to the position. Then comes low with a +3, and maybe +4 if there is a fifth. The bonus payout needs a bit of tweak though. The secondary ones just take the goal from the main and can even stay as they are if the bonus steps of the main are differentiated enough.
Something like that would be nice in general, but if it takes much time in any case then some more sophisticated system would be better.
GK LeosV medal 5000 3 years 341 days ago
I have shared some idea on this post https://igpmanager.com/forum-thread/35579. I will glad if you have any comments.
