Matthew Bailey medal 5000 12 years 366 days ago
Once you\'ve assigned a large number of designers to a couple of parts then you\'re often left over with a few spare designers and as of right now it just seems really pointless to set them working on another part because the current method doesn\'t use a progression based system, instead it\'s just a case of having x number of designers on a part to max it out for when 12 GMT comes around on that specific day.
I feel that the design system would benefit much greater if each part you have has a 0-100% upgrade progression based system, which would increase depending on how many designers were working on the part when the 12GMT check is done.
Gisty McGisterson medal 5000 12 years 366 days ago
+1
a % upgrade system would mean you could stop work and come back to a part at later date. Just take up the design where you left off.
Benjamin Crooks medal 5015 12 years 366 days ago
that would just basically mean creating more \"12GMT\" style intervals between updates as it is already a % based system... i can understand what you mean however i think it would just work out the same in the end.
Jack Basford medal 5674 
CEO & CTO 12 years 366 days ago
It has already been suggested to have a progress system layered in to this too, and it will be implemented in a future patch.
Rudolf Tilgass medal 5000 12 years 366 days ago
Awesome. So much planned... wonder if we could see a road map or future update list so we can see the whole picture :)
Jake Goodhall medal 5000 12 years 365 days ago
That\'s a good idea Rudolf.
If the developers had a basic -\'this is what will happen\' - plan A, plan B, etc - it might reduce quite an amount of posts. Or at least a quick link to the \'list\' as an answer?
