ios-personmd-notifications md-help-circle

Profile

  • Guest
    medal 0
  • Posts: 21
  • Post Likes: 3765

Notifications

  • No Unread Notifications

Suggested
Points hoarding

Should the league mod have the option on points hoarding

21.74% (15)
Yes complete ban
34.78% (24)
Allow a set amount of hoarding
43.48% (30)
No, free to hoard
warning
This thread is closed. Threads older than 6 weeks are closed automatically. To continue this discussion, create a new thread.
angle-double-left ios-arrow-back 1 ios-arrow-forward angle-double-right
medal 5000
3 years 59 days ago
I suggest allowing league moderators to control points hoarding. 
md-quotelink
medal 5000
3 years 59 days ago
Holding your points back is a strategic and risky move, if you hold it for 1 or 2 races, you'll qualify lower and have a lot more to do in the race, so why should it be illegal? 
md-quotelink
medal 5001 Super Mod
3 years 59 days ago
Personally I don't have a problem with the managers who strategically hold a few points back as a means to improve research. The issue in my opinion are the few managers who don't really play the game, rarely attend races and hoard all their design for many races. The points are all dumped part way through the season which almost inevitably results in a win. Then having avoided relegation and potentially interfered with a title battle between managers who do attend every day, they don't participate again for the remainder of the season.

Unfortunately it is almost impossible to police a league rule that disallows points hoarding. IMHO, if league hosts were given the option to set the maximum number of unassigned dp a team could have this would be a great improvement.
md-quotelink
medal 5000
3 years 58 days ago

Kevin
Personally I don't have a problem with the managers who strategically hold a few points back as a means to improve research. The issue in my opinion are the few managers who don't really play the game, rarely attend races and hoard all their design for many races. The points are all dumped part way through the season which almost inevitably results in a win. Then having avoided relegation and potentially interfered with a title battle between managers who do attend every day, they don't participate again for the remainder of the season.

Unfortunately it is almost impossible to police a league rule that disallows points hoarding. IMHO, if league hosts were given the option to set the maximum number of unassigned dp a team could have this would be a great improvement.


Idk about you but I've never seen seen the situation you described happen. The people that don't show up to races and dont spend points don't have the strategic skill with tires, fuel, and boosting, and almost always are getting very little from research because they never change the attribute. If you're getting beaten to the flag by a guy that only shows up to one race a season, that's just user error lmao. 
md-quotelink
medal 5001 Super Mod
3 years 58 days ago
You're correct, you don't know about me.

I've witnessed this strategy and it is not user error to lose against a team that is maxed out in the important attributes when the remainder of the league only have maybe 75% in the same attributes.

The people who do this often do have the strategic skills, they just choose to only show up a couple of times in the season or they're a lower level and exploit this strategy to bag the odd win. Just because you haven't witnessed it doesn't mean it doesn't happen.

A limit which could be selected by the host to prevent literally hundreds of points being hoarded would IMO be a great addition to the game. Those that see it as a legitimate strategy could just set the limit to a very high number.
md-quotelink
medal 5000
3 years 57 days ago

Kevin
You're correct, you don't know about me.

I've witnessed this strategy and it is not user error to lose against a team that is maxed out in the important attributes when the remainder of the league only have maybe 75% in the same attributes.

The people who do this often do have the strategic skills, they just choose to only show up a couple of times in the season or they're a lower level and exploit this strategy to bag the odd win. Just because you haven't witnessed it doesn't mean it doesn't happen.

A limit which could be selected by the host to prevent literally hundreds of points being hoarded would IMO be a great addition to the game. Those that see it as a legitimate strategy could just set the limit to a very high number.


It caused a massive issue in my league a while back. A guy who was decent, would sacrifice the entire season for the last race or two, pick up a couple of wins and relegate someone who had been trying really hard all season. 

I think some level of holding points cumulatively over a season is legitimate, and helpful for level 20 managers to counteract the lower research bonuses. 

An idea I had would be to limit the number of points you could drop per race, to say 40 or 50, it would stop or at least reduce the impact of major points hoarding 
md-quotelink
medal 5667
3 years 57 days ago
I think it would be better to allow the game to share out hoarded points for a team at regular times (maybe weekly) if a manager does not come back for that long.  If they come back before that period, then they can put the points where they wish.  This would make the game more competitive until those teams whos managers have quit the game entirely, retire from races.

If a level 20 manager, for example, comes back after n days the points would be shared out as such...

(n-1).20/8 

for each attribute with 20 points for self allocation.

That is if you go over the 7 day limit, and should be automatic every day once that limit has been hit.  Any spare points in this calculation should be allocated randomly...
md-quotelink
medal 5000
3 years 57 days ago

Jack

Kevin
You're correct, you don't know about me.

I've witnessed this strategy and it is not user error to lose against a team that is maxed out in the important attributes when the remainder of the league only have maybe 75% in the same attributes.

The people who do this often do have the strategic skills, they just choose to only show up a couple of times in the season or they're a lower level and exploit this strategy to bag the odd win. Just because you haven't witnessed it doesn't mean it doesn't happen.

A limit which could be selected by the host to prevent literally hundreds of points being hoarded would IMO be a great addition to the game. Those that see it as a legitimate strategy could just set the limit to a very high number.


It caused a massive issue in my league a while back. A guy who was decent, would sacrifice the entire season for the last race or two, pick up a couple of wins and relegate someone who had been trying really hard all season. 

I think some level of holding points cumulatively over a season is legitimate, and helpful for level 20 managers to counteract the lower research bonuses. 

An idea I had would be to limit the number of points you could drop per race, to say 40 or 50, it would stop or at least reduce the impact of major points hoarding 



Or you could just kick the person. If they don't show up to most races anyway, then they're just taking up space on the roster. If everyone in the league agreed to it, I don't see why you wouldn't. Or impose rules for how long you can be offline, or how many races you can miss in a row. 
md-quotelink
medal 5001 Super Mod
3 years 56 days ago
You can't kick people for not attending races. Providing they repair their cars and set a strategy that is enough. That's the reason we have AI to allow managers to take days out. In fact some leagues operate off-line where it's against the rules to manage the race. We're not discussing off-line managers, we're talking about points hoarding.

You can set a local league rule to outlaw points hoarding and threaten to kick people for breaking the rule but it is impossible to enforce as only the developers have the privileges to check people's accounts/design.

Why are you so against a setting that allows the host to limit the amount of design points a team can store? This is a simple way of enforcing a local rule without giving anyone the ability to spy on another manager's design. It also allows leagues that don't have a problem with points hoarding to continue to allow it.
md-quotelink
medal 5120
3 years 56 days ago
They better fix that issue rather than updating to 3D....
md-quotelink
medal 5000
3 years 56 days ago

Kevin
You can't kick people for not attending races. Providing they repair their cars and set a strategy that is enough. That's the reason we have AI to allow managers to take days out. In fact some leagues operate off-line where it's against the rules to manage the race. We're not discussing off-line managers, we're talking about points hoarding.

You can set a local league rule to outlaw points hoarding and threaten to kick people for breaking the rule but it is impossible to enforce as only the developers have the privileges to check people's accounts/design.

Why are you so against a setting that allows the host to limit the amount of design points a team can store? This is a simple way of enforcing a local rule without giving anyone the ability to spy on another manager's design. It also allows leagues that don't have a problem with points hoarding to continue to allow it.



We had a local rule, but as you say it's impossible to police effectively. 

I think my suggestion of an option to limit how many points you can drop per race could work, at least for the one race wonders at the end of a season 😂😂
md-quotelink
medal 5001 Super Mod
3 years 56 days ago
Hi Jack

Yes your solution works similar to limiting the number of points that can be stored. By limiting the points you can store you are also effectively limiting the points that can be assigned because you can't assign more points than you have.

With your solution, yes it stops the final race super dumpers but it is easier to exploit. For example, let's assume I limit the points that can be assigned to 40... This doesn't stop a manager from hoarding points for ten races (200dp) and then dropping 40 points every race for the next ten races, 20 from the previous race Design HQ + 20 from the 200dp savings account. 

This manager will still end up with a much stronger car towards the end of the season because he sacrificed the first ten races and harvested a lot of research points.

If you limit the points that can be banked to 40, he can only drop 40 points once then he's used them all.
md-quotelink
medal 5000
3 years 55 days ago

Kevin
You can't kick people for not attending races. Providing they repair their cars and set a strategy that is enough. That's the reason we have AI to allow managers to take days out. In fact some leagues operate off-line where it's against the rules to manage the race. We're not discussing off-line managers, we're talking about points hoarding.

You can set a local league rule to outlaw points hoarding and threaten to kick people for breaking the rule but it is impossible to enforce as only the developers have the privileges to check people's accounts/design.

Why are you so against a setting that allows the host to limit the amount of design points a team can store? This is a simple way of enforcing a local rule without giving anyone the ability to spy on another manager's design. It also allows leagues that don't have a problem with points hoarding to continue to allow it.



I'm not against it as an idea, but I think there are much more pressing things the devs could be working on. Plus, it's against the spirit of the game. If a manager wants to sacrafice a bunch of races to be fast for one, that's their prerogative. If you don't like, you can or have a league host kick them, there's no built in rule to the game saying you can't kick them for that. Plus, there are plenty of leagues where you can't even miss one race or be offline for more than 2 or 3 days before getting kicked, so I don't get why your league couldn't just do that to prevent managers skipping a bunch of races then ending up with 200 points at the end
md-quotelink
medal 5001 Super Mod
3 years 55 days ago
Boris, I'll say this once more... We are not discussing whether or not managers should be kicked for not attending races, we're discussing whether or not to allow points hoarding, two entirely separate subjects. 

I don't have the problem in my league but I have witnessed it in a league I competed in some months ago and I also speak with other experienced managers who have had problems with this design strategy and are powerless to do anything to prevent it.

 If a manager wants to sacrafice a bunch of races to be fast for one, that's their prerogative. If you don't like, you can or have a league host kick them, there's no built in rule to the game saying you can't kick them for that.

Any league can have a rule outlawing points hoarding and threaten to kick people for breaking the rule but it's impossible to enforce the rule because there is no way of checking whether someone is doing it.

I agree with you, the devs currently have more important things to focus on but this is a suggestion thread so we can leave it to the iGP team to decide whether or not it is a good use of their time. If they don't think it is they will reject it.

IMHO this would be a welcome improvement to the game. Looking at the voting it is about a 50/50 split between those that would like to disallow hoarding and those that, like you, see it as a legitimate strategy. Coding this as a rule that could be applied by a host would satisfy both sides of the argument.
md-quotelink
angle-double-left ios-arrow-back 1 ios-arrow-forward angle-double-right

You must be logged in to post a reply.