Profile

  • Guest
    0
  • Posts: 21
  • Post Likes: 3765

Notifications

  • No Unread Notifications

Forums > Global Forums (English) > Suggestions

Suggested
New retirement cause (engine)

Should there be retirements of engine failure, when a team doesn't replace their engine for a long time (inactive)?

32% (8)
Yes! Anyone can have it!
36% (9)
Yes, but only for managers who are inactive and are not replacing their engines.
28% (7)
No!
4% (1)
I don't know.
This thread is closed. Threads older than 6 weeks are closed automatically. To continue this discussion, create a new thread.
1
This topic has been closed by the moderator
Jimmy Richard 5000
3 years 317 days ago (Last edited by Jimmy Richard 3 years 317 days ago)
I suggest another retirement feature, called an engine failure, in which anyone could get it, and/or a manager didn't replace his engine often or is inactive. But, what do you think?

In retiring, parts causes suspension failure, while a worn engine causes engine failure. If you get both, you have the Double Trouble.
Slo Bro 5000
3 years 317 days ago
An inactive managers’ car already retires because of parts not beeing fixed, can’t see how engine retirement would be an improvement.
This topic has been closed by the moderator
1

You must be logged in to post a reply.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to its use of cookies. Read our Privacy Policy