Rejected

KERS on/off as part of rules

As in the case of refueling/no refueling, the presence/absence of KERS in the championship is chosen by the league host and managers. DRS remains the same as in actual GP racing. But kers interfere with the realism of the races, turning the last laps into a crazy kers orchestra. Some like it, some don't. Who like it, let them race with it, who don't like it, race without it. Like the refueling rule and the two-tyre rule

First of all, ERS is different from KERS
Check this website to know the differences between ERS and KERS

and the boost in game is “disposable”
In real life, ERS/KERS is to help drivers to reduce the fuel usage instead of speed boost

Thanks for the link. It's not about terminology. But about turning the game into a more interesting and fair competition

well KERS may be not fair to some teams who started an non-refuel race with very low amount of fuel, drivers of those team can co crazily fast in acceleration and there may be other issues. So i think that only ERS/boost is enough

OK. Thank you, sir

got it