Pola Pola medal 5000 5 years 119 days ago (Last edited by
Pola Pola 5 years 119 days ago)
Should Hamilton retire?
Jokes aside, Vettel is still one of the best drivers on the grid despite his reputation for being one of the most error-prone WDCs.
Note that Ferrari, while having a great car, are to put it mildly not ideal when it comes to things like their race strategy and management. There was
a post on Reddit recently that basically highlights how Vettel has to do the jobs of both driver and strategist because Ferrari utterly lack the proactive planning, decisive decision making, and sharp organisation that's necessary for good race strategy. This is in contrast to teams like Red Bull/Toro Rosso who are more or less glued to their drivers on the radio and highly attentive to their comments and queries.
EDIT: Also managed to remember
this that was posted after the British GP.
So if anything Vettel is still an exceptional driver especially considering how much multitasking he has to do (and that's coming from someone who's not a fan of Vettel). Any realistic replacement (including Leclerc IMO who I believe still lacks experience, poise, consistency and more despite having a lot of raw pace and potential as a future WDC. Including Bottas since... it's Bottas, 'nuff said, why would you replace Vettel with Bottas? Including Ricciardo as maybe he's potentially as good of a driver on track but for Ferrari, especially for the need to essentially come up with his own strategy, we'll have to see) would be a downgrade. The only drivers on the grid who are arguably clearly better than Vettel at the moment IMO are Hamilton and Verstappen, but Verstappen is also highly incident-prone, if not moreso than Vettel.
The only reason for Vettel to retire would be if he doesn't have the motivation to do it anymore. Vettel is one of the F1 drivers who actually yearn for testing time as well, as opposed to some of his peers.