ios-personmd-notifications md-help-circle

Profile

  • Guest
    medal 0
  • Posts: 21
  • Post Likes: 3765

Notifications

  • No Unread Notifications

Suggested
Teams in debt or without(...)

warning
This thread is closed. Threads older than 6 weeks are closed automatically. To continue this discussion, create a new thread.
angle-double-left ios-arrow-back 1 ios-arrow-forward angle-double-right
medal 5000
4 years 239 days ago
participating in races. (title continuation)

Is there any intention of the game to make the transfer market restricted only to managers with a positive balance? This would make it impossible for managers who are not concerned about financial health to stock their teams with high-value game development staff, such as CD specialists in vital game attributes.
Still taking advantage of this issue, these same managers who are financially unbalanced would have a few days to balance the accounts at risk of losing all employees for financial balance.
And to close any possibility of employee backlogs, managers who are not participating for more than a month of league / race, they should also not be able to buy from the market and within a certain time should be considered inactive and put in a kind of snooze mode.
Let me know if I didn't make clear my ideas.


md-quotelink
medal 5000
4 years 239 days ago

Carlos
participating in races. (title continuation)

Is there any intention of the game to make the transfer market restricted only to managers with a positive balance? This would make it impossible for managers who are not concerned about financial health to stock their teams with high-value game development staff, such as CD specialists in vital game attributes.
Still taking advantage of this issue, these same managers who are financially unbalanced would have a few days to balance the accounts at risk of losing all employees for financial balance.
And to close any possibility of employee backlogs, managers who are not participating for more than a month of league / race, they should also not be able to buy from the market and within a certain time should be considered inactive and put in a kind of snooze mode.
Let me know if I didn't make clear my ideas.





Ok, i hear your take on what the consequence should be. What I don`t understand is what causes it.  


There are already penalties in place that addresses this issue; red balance=no HQ development which in turns means you can`t buy higher level staff from transfer or any other market.  These consequences are the driving force of the game.  

md-quotelink
medal 5000
4 years 239 days ago
but only those penalties don't force managers to get a positive balance in their finances. they still can reach the highest levels and by using tokens they still can buy any staff as possible. it is a shame you fight in market with broken players full of tokens that uses their accounts only to collect employees and not to compete. Think about it. 
md-quotelink
medal 5000
4 years 238 days ago

Carlos
but only those penalties don't force managers to get a positive balance (I don`t see why it should, it`s their management style that got them there) in their finances. they still can reach the highest levels(no....they can only buy staff/drivers equal or lower than their own level) and by using tokens they still can buy any staff as possible.(It doesn`t make sense for someone to use tokens to buy lower level staff/drivers instead of developing their HQ so they can buy higher level staff/drivers.) it is a shame you fight in market with broken(they have tokens, they`re not broke. They choose how to spend it) players full of tokens that uses their accounts only to collect employees(And here is a fact...you`re right! that`s a tactic used by advanced players with multiple accounts.  and not to compete. Think about it. 




md-quotelink
medal 5000
4 years 238 days ago
Imagine that if we are playing a management game, why managers that don't have money should be able to sign with any employee? I think that is very simple. If you don't have money, how can you pay salary to them?
md-quotelink
medal 5365
4 years 238 days ago
No the no hq development in dept is enough
md-quotelink
medal 5000
4 years 237 days ago

Carlos
Imagine that if we are playing a management game, why managers that don't have money should be able to sign with any employee? I think that is very simple. If you don't have money, how can you pay salary to them?



That`s iGP`s way of making sure no one has an upper hand bc they have more cash and tokens. You can have all the cash and tokens you want, without your HQ developed, you are stuck! 
md-quotelink
medal 5002
4 years 236 days ago
The HQ development doesn't effect accounts that are solely created for getting good staff.  Cash needs to remained relevent even after all HQ upgrades are purchased.
md-quotelink
medal 5053
4 years 236 days ago
Buongiorno 
md-quotelink
medal 5000
4 years 232 days ago

Joshua
The HQ development doesn't effect accounts that are solely created for getting good staff.  Cash needs to remained relevent even after all HQ upgrades are purchased.



Are people making multiple accounts where they don't race be source staff?
md-quotelink
medal 5002
4 years 232 days ago

Andrew

Joshua
The HQ development doesn't effect accounts that are solely created for getting good staff.  Cash needs to remained relevent even after all HQ upgrades are purchased.



Are people making multiple accounts where they don't race be source staff?



I wouldn't bet against it.
md-quotelink
angle-double-left ios-arrow-back 1 ios-arrow-forward angle-double-right

You must be logged in to post a reply.