ios-personmd-notifications md-help-circle

Profile

  • Guest
    medal 0
  • Posts: 21
  • Post Likes: 3765

Notifications

  • No Unread Notifications

Top of rewards

warning
This thread is closed. Threads older than 6 weeks are closed automatically. To continue this discussion, create a new thread.
angle-double-left ios-arrow-back 1 ios-arrow-forward angle-double-right
md-lock This topic has been closed by the moderator
medal 5000
11 years 193 days ago
Currently in the juice have a reward if we achieve the career goal, which is pretty good, but I see or think, it would be a better idea if instead of a reward only give us three choices of target.

Example.
1 -. Win to earn $ 10
2 -. Secure podium to earn $ 8
3 -. Finish 5th or better to earn $ 6
(money above is an example)

Thus while not "comply" with the goal we are also a little benefit especially when you have two good drivers who spend fighting the first place which always forces lose one of the objectives.Thanks for your attention and success.
md-quotelink
medal 5000
11 years 193 days ago
i dont get it
md-quotelink
medal 5000
11 years 192 days ago
I think I understand what you are meaning.  We should get to choose the objective for each driver from a selection.
I am not sure how this would work but it is worth discussing as it might have some merit.
md-quotelink
medal 5000
11 years 192 days ago
Choose the target is good, but not what I mean.

What I mean is that we have alternative objectives, if not win the race but also manages to have a remuneration podium since the team contributes equally.

As I said in the first post, in my case I have 2 good and (not always) both fight to win and I removed one of the bonuses, which I paracer a little unfair.
md-quotelink
medal 5000
11 years 192 days ago
thank you - now I understand.

I didn't think the objectives were the same - I thought they were quite different?  But as I cannot remember exactly then someone will be able to comment on this.  I don't remember ever having the objective for both my drivers as being that they both had to win?!
md-quotelink
medal 5000
11 years 191 days ago
I almost got it XD

The problem is not that it is the same goal, maybe I'll give you a simple example to understand my suggestion.

Race 1.
Pilot 1 - Objective Winning the race.
Pilot 2 - Objective Ensure podium.

Occurrences, During the race the rider won the race in January and February came second pilot, both objectives were achieved, and I get 100% of the reward.

Race 2.
Pilot 1 - Objective Winning the race.
Pilot 2 - Objective Ensure podium.

Occurrences, During the race the rider won race two and the pilot 1 came in third, only one of the objectives were achieved, and I get 50% of the reward.

Race 3.
Pilot 1 - Objective Ensure podium
Pilot 2 - Objective Winning the race.

Occurrences, During the race one win the race pilot and two pilot came second, only one of the objectives were achieved, so again I receive 50% of the reward.So as my two drivers are very good and are getting good results but are exchanged victories removes the one of which I cut earnings targets.

-My suggestion.
You have alternative objectives, if a driver asks for the victory but comes second, third or fourth, just something logically may charge unless the main objective and that was my proposal, if you get the first target $ 10 by the second objective that you get $ 8 and the third objective you in $ 6 (obviously not cumulative)

I hope I explained this time managed better, I'm using google translator
md-quotelink
medal 5000
11 years 191 days ago
Objective/Rewards for quali results too
md-quotelink
medal 5000
11 years 190 days ago
Woot - now I get it !! :D
And well done for getting your meaning across with google translate - many have tried but few have succeeded!

And yes I understand what you mean Joanth - I agree - but there is no doubt a lot of difficulty in coding what you suggest (or maybe not).

+1 Nag - I often do quite well in quali and then get nowhere in the race - lol
md-quotelink
medal 5000
11 years 189 days ago
lol

Me too I happened to classify good and in the race I is awful, well at least you explain me achieve well, now only have to consider the possibility of doing or not and wait for their response.

Success and luck.
md-quotelink
md-lock This topic has been closed by the moderator
angle-double-left ios-arrow-back 1 ios-arrow-forward angle-double-right

You must be logged in to post a reply.