ios-personmd-notifications md-help-circle

Profile

  • Guest
    medal 0
  • Posts: 21
  • Post Likes: 3765

Notifications

  • No Unread Notifications

Forums > Global Forums (English) > Bugs

Unresolved
Very bad qualy

warning
This thread is closed. Threads older than 6 weeks are closed automatically. To continue this discussion, create a new thread.
angle-double-left ios-arrow-back 1 ios-arrow-forward angle-double-right
md-lock This topic has been closed by the moderator
Aceroba Ent medal 5000
4 years 86 days ago
¿Qué has intentado hacer?
I tried to classify well but the result was bad.

For no apparent reason.

¿Qué es lo que ocurrió?
Despite having a good overall design, for the Monaco circuit I have maximized important areas such as driving, being the one that had the best that area in addition to others and did not give any results.

The qualifying, once again was very bad for both cars.

¿El problema ocurrió mientras usaba wi-fi, datos móviles o ambos?
Mobile data

¿El error se produjo en la app, en PC o en ambos?
App

¿Cuál es el modelo de su dispositivo?
Red Magic 5G

¿Qué sistema operativo posee?
Android

¿Cuál es el número de versión del sistema operativo?
Android 10.

¿Se puede reproducir el error?
It can be repeated and seen in almost every race. There are very few that I qualified decently.
There is a tendency for one of my drivers to qualify 3 or 4 positions behind the best with the same tyres as me but the other does the penultimate driver with the same tyre.

But in Monaco this didn't happen and both cars qualified in the back.
I didn't spend any tokens.

Comentarios adicionales:
The compatibility of the car with the circuit is good or very good, the practices within 5 minutes of the end of the practice period are excellent but the classification is generally very bad.

Thanks
md-quotelink
Kevin Bissell medal 5000 Super Mod
4 years 86 days ago
Are you saying that your competitors cars have poor compatibility for the circuit and therefore this is why you believe you should qualify in a better position than them? 

If so, how do you know? Did they all share their car designs with you and in what way were your cars better suited to the circuit?

You post this as a Bug report titled "Very bad qualy" but when I look at the results one of your cars was only 0.044 seconds slower than the pole sitter and the other 0.050. You say both cars qualified at the back but they were in 14th & 15th place out of 26 cars that qualified on SS. For me that is mid-field, not the back.

You can disregard practice lap times, you don't know whether your competitors are sandbagging by setting their times before applying dp or repairing their car and you have no idea what health your competitors drivers were at the time of qualifying. In practice one of your cars was 0.274 seconds slower than his team mate, in qualifying they were separated by just 0.006 seconds. This is because in practice driver errors are active but in qualifying they are disabled.

So why do you believe there is a bug? Although you may have the highest design in one or two attributes it doesn't necessarily mean you have the best balanced car for the circuit. There are also quite a few design points available from suppliers which enables people to modify the balance to suit the circuit characteristics. 
md-quotelink
Vinigano Zozir medal 5000
4 years 86 days ago
Totally agree with Kevin
md-quotelink
Aceroba Ent medal 5000
4 years 86 days ago

Kevin
Are you saying that your competitors cars have poor compatibility for the circuit and therefore this is why you believe you should qualify in a better position than them? 

If so, how do you know? Did they all share their car designs with you and in what way were your cars better suited to the circuit?

You post this as a Bug report titled "Very bad qualy" but when I look at the results one of your cars was only 0.044 seconds slower than the pole sitter and the other 0.050. You say both cars qualified at the back but they were in 14th & 15th place out of 26 cars that qualified on SS. For me that is mid-field, not the back.

You can disregard practice lap times, you don't know whether your competitors are sandbagging by setting their times before applying dp or repairing their car and you have no idea what health your competitors drivers were at the time of qualifying. In practice one of your cars was 0.274 seconds slower than his team mate, in qualifying they were separated by just 0.006 seconds. This is because in practice driver errors are active but in qualifying they are disabled.

So why do you believe there is a bug? Although you may have the highest design in one or two attributes it doesn't necessarily mean you have the best balanced car for the circuit. There are also quite a few design points available from suppliers which enables people to modify the balance to suit the circuit characteristics. 



No, maybe I said it wrong.
What I have meant is that even having a car with high compatibility, I usually rank behind rivals. Which translates into being slowed down by traffic, spending kers and that's it.

You don't have to look at the Monaco results. This is repeated in practically all of them.

Some of you say that you have to make a balanced car, others that it is better to put in one or a certain area depending on the circuit.

The reality is that we only have 20 points, you have to prioritize and there is no clear pattern.
md-quotelink
md-lock This topic has been closed by the moderator
angle-double-left ios-arrow-back 1 ios-arrow-forward angle-double-right

You must be logged in to post a reply.