ios-personmd-notifications md-help-circle

Profile

  • Guest
    medal 0
  • Posts: 21
  • Post Likes: 3765

Notifications

  • No Unread Notifications

Forums > Global Forums (English) > Suggestions

Suggested
New retirement cause (engine)

Should there be retirements of engine failure, when a team doesn't replace their engine for a long time (inactive)?

32% (8)
Yes! Anyone can have it!
36% (9)
Yes, but only for managers who are inactive and are not replacing their engines.
28% (7)
No!
4% (1)
I don't know.
warning
This thread is closed. Threads older than 6 weeks are closed automatically. To continue this discussion, create a new thread.
angle-double-left ios-arrow-back 1 ios-arrow-forward angle-double-right
md-lock This topic has been closed by the moderator
Jimmy Richard medal 5000
3 years 283 days ago (Last edited by Jimmy Richard 3 years 283 days ago)
I suggest another retirement feature, called an engine failure, in which anyone could get it, and/or a manager didn't replace his engine often or is inactive. But, what do you think?

In retiring, parts causes suspension failure, while a worn engine causes engine failure. If you get both, you have the Double Trouble.
md-quotelink
Slo Bro medal 5000
3 years 283 days ago
An inactive managers’ car already retires because of parts not beeing fixed, can’t see how engine retirement would be an improvement.
md-quotelink
md-lock This topic has been closed by the moderator
angle-double-left ios-arrow-back 1 ios-arrow-forward angle-double-right

You must be logged in to post a reply.