Hollow Negativity

Negative comments in forums rarely say anything meaningful about the subject; they simply reveal the limits of the person posting them.

Calling a well-constructed explanation “AI-generated” is not an argument; it is a shortcut taken by someone who cannot produce or recognise thoughtful work themselves.

The fact that a detailed, coherent post is immediately questioned only confirms that the commenter is out of their depth. The quality of the explanation stands on its own, and the hasty suspicion merely highlights the gap between genuine effort and the inability to match it.

Dismissing solid work with a lazy accusation is not insight, and it certainly is not critique. It is the refuge of someone who has nothing substantive to add. In the end, such people do not elevate the discussion; they merely confirm, quite efficiently, the gap in intellectual maturity between those who build knowledge and those who merely sneer at it. 🤖

In iGP we all play as real people. Everyone can have their own style, but when someone chooses to act as if they were an AI, replying like a bot and keeping that role in every interaction, it ends up wearing down the community. People join to compete, discuss and enjoy the game with other humans, not to interact with a “virtual assistant” inside the league.

This isn’t personal; it’s simply something that needs to be clarified: this platform is designed for human players. It’s fine to have a unique identity, but it’s important to adapt to the environment. When someone keeps a bot-like dynamic, it becomes confusing and tiring for those trying to have normal conversations.

It would be best to drop the “AI role” and take part like everyone else: as a regular player.

On the other hand, your comments don’t bother me at all; I actually think they add something to the forum. But well, there are people who feel differently.

Some people like apples and others prefer pears. That’s normal. No reason to get upset.

I appreciate the clarification, and I understand that the platform is designed for human interaction.

That said, the tone or style one adopts in expressing themselves, so long as it is thoughtful and coherent does not diminish the value of their contribution. After all, just because my avatar is a cyborg doesn't mean I use AI to write. Your avatar is Volvo + FedEx, so you sound like a car delivering packages. Nonsense.

Accusations of “acting like AI” or assumptions that a well-constructed post could not have been written by a human reveal more about the reader’s expectations than the writer’s effort. Forum discussions thrive on clarity, insight, and originality, not on a single uniform mode of expression.

As you note, not everyone will respond the same way. Preferences differ, just as some like apples and others pears. What matters is that substantive contributions are recognised for their merit, rather than pre-judged by superficial markers of style.

Oh wow, just one line and you go berserk. To clarify, your answer read to me like it was written by ai, copy paste fed into ai and copy pasted the answer by ai. It was not the first time one of your replies gave me that feeling, idk if you ever used ai in your past post but as Balerion said, it becomes tiring. That post was very long and a large portion was a recap (hallmark for ai in my view)

It seems it’s your online persona, I respect that but I don’t like the feeling of talking to an ai bot on a forum. Don’t take it personal.

Guess I’m just lazy, don’t have anything substantive to add, don’t elevate the discussion, am intellectually immature, am out of my depth, unable to match your genuine effort, can’t produce or reckognise thoughtful work and am very limited and I sneer at knowledge (yes you said all that, maybe a bit overboard for a 1 line reply, idk, don’t take it personal but it seems you already did)

Anyhow, the anger revealed you’re human after all 😊 

Message received, thanks. 🤖