Luiz Otavio Santos medal 5000 12 years 307 days ago
The targeting system is very bad. If I win a race with the pilot "A" and I get to the second with pilot "B". In the next race the goal is to finish first with the "A" and the second with "B" and it does not change until I can't finish in this order. And there happens to be exactly the position of the previous race.
This requires the encouragement of pilots and gets very boring ..... Need an urgent change.
Thanks GT
Dean Boy medal 5000 12 years 307 days ago
Dude, please start calling them drivers....lol
Luiz Otavio Santos medal 5000 12 years 306 days ago
Dude,
if you do not like the way I wrote, keep quiet and let those interested in talking to rule something productive.
I use Google Translator and the developers I fully understand the IGP since the time of the BETA. So BE QUIET!
Dean Boy medal 5000 12 years 306 days ago
cara,
tudo que eu estava simplesmente dizendo era chamá-lo de um driver ....
Leve-o no espírito ele se destina.
chill out ...
nuff amor
Luiz Otavio Santos medal 5000 12 years 306 days ago
Dude,
In Portugues : Pilot = PILOTO / Driver = Piloto or Motorista. For me is the same Driver or Pilot and GT translate for PILOT not DRIVER. The same occurs with LAP, with Google Translator translate for ROUND. Because in PT ROUND and LAP is the same word : VOLTA.
Dan Gurney medal 5000 12 years 297 days ago
Coming back to the "real" point of Luiz: Yes, the objectives system isquite ridiculous and needs to be changed. Because when, for instance, due to a good management in changing weather conditions in a race a team scores a double win (which is well over its normal abilities) this team is penalized in the next race, because the objective refers to the result of that last race and the team will (normaly) get no prize money at all. So a good rank in one race may be much too costly for the next...
Giving the objective "Finish" in the top four or "Finish on the podium" would most probably be more realistic.