Hey all, as you should know by now, yesterday suppliers were given more influence in how they affect the design of the car.
In order to continue maintaining a fair and balanced system, it's a good idea to require teams to lock in term contracts with suppliers for a given number of races.
For example, I can agree to use Tifosi as my engine supplier for at least 10 races. I can't switch or terminate the agreement within those 10 races. After those 10 races have passed, Tifosi remains as my supplier, but now I have the freedom of choice to switch to a different supplier or continue using Tifosi.
By having this, players with plenty of cash can't switch suppliers throughout the season without at least waiting for the term contract to expire. This maintains the fairness of the game and keeps the game away from the "pay-to-win" model.
What do you think of this? Should we add term contracts? Do you have something to supplement the idea? Let us know below.
In order to continue maintaining a fair and balanced system, it's a good idea to require teams to lock in term contracts with suppliers for a given number of races.
For example, I can agree to use Tifosi as my engine supplier for at least 10 races. I can't switch or terminate the agreement within those 10 races. After those 10 races have passed, Tifosi remains as my supplier, but now I have the freedom of choice to switch to a different supplier or continue using Tifosi.
By having this, players with plenty of cash can't switch suppliers throughout the season without at least waiting for the term contract to expire. This maintains the fairness of the game and keeps the game away from the "pay-to-win" model.
What do you think of this? Should we add term contracts? Do you have something to supplement the idea? Let us know below.
Very good idea ! :-)