igra formula medal 5000 5 years 159 days ago
Juliano
Think about a situation, you are in second place but knowing that you are faster than the car ahead, already calculates how many laps to overcome it, but you see that there are few laps to finish the race. You find that you are on the last lap and increase the aggressiveness know that before finishing the lap will surpass, especially in the DRS zone, your car is very fast your victory no longer leaves your hands! LOL. You already calculate the points you will win, etc. Your car arrives in the long awaited area of DRS, but opa! What's that! The car that is in first sees an offline player, q even if qr adjusted his car and much less trained ... to help the first place in the DRS zone preventing his overtaking, then you fall into despair kkkk will q only I think this ?!
As given in your example - be the first car, not the second.
Also - "you are faster", "your car is very fast" - if so then why aren't you leading the race but second?
According to your description I imagine you leading 15 seconds and DRS KERS doesnt really matter.
Bo Alberti medal 5000 5 years 159 days ago
Isnt that what i just said?
Leo Yeo medal 4728 5 years 159 days ago
"Sometimes u benefit, sometimes someone else benefits. It should cancel out both benefits in the long run."
In that case, arguably it should be okay to add a "lucky boost" that is given to 1 driver randomly per race. It should cancel out in the long term because sometimes you benefit sometimes someone else does. But just because it's seemingly "fair" does not make it correct, fun or needed if you get what I mean.
If you are not okay with having a "lucky boost" system, then you are not okay with drs from backmarkers existing in the game.
I'd much prefer less luck be involved and for it to be more up to the manager rather than something basically unpredictable, managers shouldn't be forced to think about people who are redundant to the final results of the race. On another note, blue flags should be in iGP too
Bo Alberti medal 5000 5 years 158 days ago
"Ok ill give u that, but in return i want 3 staples"
All jokes aside tho. For the sake of argument ima flip it again.
When i look around this forum i see all sorts of stuff like 'we want reality'
People seems to want: updated f1 calendar, crashes, yellows, blues, sc's, vsc's, injured drivers, more car specs, 1 guy even said copy f1,
Flat tyres, out of fuel is dnf, and-so-on,
But when drs doesnt go 'our' way, suddenly it has to be eliminated from the game. Lapped cars give drs in real f1 too..........
"I mean, c-c-come on!"
I think its mostly a false sense of entitlement, people FEEL LIKE they deserve the win, but didnt get what they want so they come up with another
'great idea' to flip things back in their favour.
Im glad i dont have this flaw. I can only celebrate teams like Sak beating me while im lvl 18 and Sak is 16.
Maybe i should come up with a 'great idea' OFF TRACK (by means of forumtopics) to flip the odds in my favour again
Sorta say, cheat Sak out of the victory by means of politics..
No thanx. Well done Sak! I will lose smiling n try again next race, for it is not the winner's fault for losers not winning.
And on that note, back to the original idea.
To turn off drs for people not active;
I work irregular hours, sometimes i get called n hv to leave on the spot, making me unable to do any form of setup.
Im guessing im not the only one.
Should we (inactives from time to time) all be punished and lose our drs because we can not attend and some people cant handle defeat?
No thanx.
Drs is a way to strategise, kers is a way to strategise, why cant lapped-car-drs simply be seen as another way to strategise?
A lot of people seem to want reality, f1-lapped-car-drs is a reality.
As soon as people speak of unfair...... they are usually being unfair to others.
