ios-personmd-notifications md-help-circle

Profile

  • Guest
    medal 0
  • Posts: 21
  • Post Likes: 3764

Notifications

  • No Unread Notifications

Suggested
Bigger chance of Saftey Car

Should this suggestion happen?

32.56% (28)
Yes!
67.44% (58)
No!
warning
This thread is closed. Threads older than 6 weeks are closed automatically. To continue this discussion, create a new thread.
angle-double-left ios-arrow-back 1 2 ios-arrow-forward angle-double-right
medal 5441
96 days ago
I think there should be a bigger chance of a saftey carfor more excitment.
md-quotelink
medal 5110
96 days ago
This gets mentioned regularly and always gets the same response; It doesn't work as not only does it introduce too much randomness, the safety car only happens when a car retires, which normally just means an inactive manager causing a safety car every single race.
md-quotelink
medal 5057
96 days ago

Cameron
This gets mentioned regularly and always gets the same response; It doesn't work as not only does it introduce too much randomness, the safety car only happens when a car retires, which normally just means an inactive manager causing a safety car every single race.



yeah, but that could be where another idea comes in where they are driver mistakes every so often but no safety car for suspension failures
md-quotelink
medal 5067
96 days ago
md-quotelink
medal 5632
95 days ago
SC was already there, he was unable to add, how well he was removed along with vsc, and flags, the chance that he would be added again is absolutely meager, I would say impossible, and it's sad 馃様... 
md-quotelink
medal 5217
95 days ago

Dome


i agree

md-quotelink
medal 5323
94 days ago
Didn't work last time out.  Won't work now, in my opinion...
md-quotelink
medal 5578
62 days ago

Cameron
This gets mentioned regularly and always gets the same response; It doesn't work as not only does it introduce too much randomness, the safety car only happens when a car retires, which normally just means an inactive manager causing a safety car every single race.


Inactive managers must be removed, simple. Vsc and Sc added a good random dynamic to a race. It's a f1 racing manager for crying out loud. 

md-quotelink
medal 5375
62 days ago
Katz

Cameron
This gets mentioned regularly and always gets the same response; It doesn't work as not only does it introduce too much randomness, the safety car only happens when a car retires, which normally just means an inactive manager causing a safety car every single race.


Inactive managers must be removed, simple. Vsc and Sc added a good random dynamic to a race. It's a f1 racing manager for crying out loud. 


No sir, it’s a formula racing game, not limited to formula 1


md-quotelink
medal 5033
61 days ago
Downvote
md-quotelink
medal 5632
61 days ago

Stuffy
Downvote



Why? 
md-quotelink
medal 5668
61 days ago
Every time this subject is brought up, we can see how toxic the IGP community is.
Some managers scoff at the suggestion and make light of their peers.
Managers in general need to be aware that the game only exists because more than one person plays. Once people stop playing, the game is over.
SC is an excellent way to give a minimal chance of an almost decided race to change.
There are data in the game that already allow for a possibility of cars crashing and generating SC. We have the experience of the driver, car maintenance and so on.
I think the IGP could create this SC through this data and put an on/off option in the game's settings. That way I would meet those who want and who do not want the SC.
md-quotelink
medal 5553
61 days ago
What I don't understand is, you had it implemented at one time. Why didn't you just add the option for league managers to turn safety cars or vsc on or off? Then everyone is happy and we wouldn't need to reply to this exact same thread topic every week. 
md-quotelink
medal 5668
61 days ago

Lightning
What I don't understand is, you had it implemented at one time. Why didn't you just add the option for league managers to turn safety cars or vsc on or off? Then everyone is happy and we wouldn't need to reply to this exact same thread topic every week. 


In fact it's not just that.
The SC implemented in the game did nothing but make all cars run slower, that is, it didn't change anything. the SC needs to be better worked, using the specifications of each driver and team. It needs to present a real possibility of increasing disputes.
And yes, put an option to turn on/off the SC function.
The big problem is that game developers prefer to read the same suggestion every week and don't position managers on the subject.
I have already suggested in another post, to centralize the suggestions of each region for your translators and only these will take the suggestions to the destination. This would filter and make it easier for managers and developers to understand.


md-quotelink
medal 5756
61 days ago (Last edited by N 么 么 B 61 days ago)
Pedro

SC is an excellent way to give a minimal chance of an almost decided race to change.



So basically allow someone else to win by luck and not skill/strategy? You really expect those that have spent countless hours pouring over data to be better managers not to be 'toxic' about that???


md-quotelink
medal 5668
61 days ago

N

Pedro

SC is an excellent way to give a minimal chance of an almost decided race to change.



So basically allow someone else to win by luck and not skill/strategy? You really expect those that have spent countless hours pouring over data to be better managers not to be toxic about that???




So friend, the option to be toxic is yours alone.
But what you and many others here need to understand is that the game doesn't belong to you.
But unlike you, people who would like an SC know that the game must reach more people. So, both I and the others, we suggest an option to turn the SC on and off, so that you can continue playing like today.
Furthermore, with the possibility of a car breaking down or the driver running on the track directly linked to the driver's experience and the car's unwinding, it is not luck, but a capacity for development.
But as a suggestion, if you don't want to hear about SC, don't go into the topic. After all, we already know your opinion and at least for me it doesn't matter. Unless it's productive!


md-quotelink
medal 5756
61 days ago

Pedro

N

Pedro

SC is an excellent way to give a minimal chance of an almost decided race to change.



So basically allow someone else to win by luck and not skill/strategy? You really expect those that have spent countless hours pouring over data to be better managers not to be toxic about that???




So friend, the option to be toxic is yours alone.
But what you and many others here need to understand is that the game doesn't belong to you.
But unlike you, people who would like an SC know that the game must reach more people. So, both I and the others, we suggest an option to turn the SC on and off, so that you can continue playing like today.
Furthermore, with the possibility of a car breaking down or the driver running on the track directly linked to the driver's experience and the car's unwinding, it is not luck, but a capacity for development.
But as a suggestion, if you don't want to hear about SC, don't go into the topic. After all, we already know your opinion and at least for me it doesn't matter. Unless it's productive!





Dude what the heck are you on about? 'You' said the community was toxic for not supporting the decision. 


Personally I don't care whether it's introduced or not, just letting you know folks have a right not to want it and that doesn't make them toxic. Your retort makes no sense.

md-quotelink
medal 5668
61 days ago

N

Pedro

N

Pedro

SC is an excellent way to give a minimal chance of an almost decided race to change.



So basically allow someone else to win by luck and not skill/strategy? You really expect those that have spent countless hours pouring over data to be better managers not to be toxic about that???




So friend, the option to be toxic is yours alone.
But what you and many others here need to understand is that the game doesn't belong to you.
But unlike you, people who would like an SC know that the game must reach more people. So, both I and the others, we suggest an option to turn the SC on and off, so that you can continue playing like today.
Furthermore, with the possibility of a car breaking down or the driver running on the track directly linked to the driver's experience and the car's unwinding, it is not luck, but a capacity for development.
But as a suggestion, if you don't want to hear about SC, don't go into the topic. After all, we already know your opinion and at least for me it doesn't matter. Unless it's productive!





Dude what the heck are you on about? 'You' said the community was toxic for not supporting the decision. 


Personally I don't care whether it's introduced or not, just letting you know folks have a right not to want it and that doesn't make them toxic. Your retort makes no sense.



I agree that people have a right not to agree with the idea.
The problem is not the disapproval, but the way they treat each manager who comes here to suggest the SC.
You must remember that unfortunately this forum is absolutely disorganized. And that some of the managers who suggest SC are new to the game or never participated in the Forum discussions.
It sucks having to explain every time, I understand that. But the fault of all this is the developers of the IGP. They urgently need to organize this here.
One more point to remember is that the SC title can be repeated, but the content and the way to apply it in the game can be different.
So the only thing I hope is respect!


md-quotelink
medal 5375
61 days ago
Pedro

N

Pedro

SC is an excellent way to give a minimal chance of an almost decided race to change.



So basically allow someone else to win by luck and not skill/strategy? You really expect those that have spent countless hours pouring over data to be better managers not to be toxic about that???




So friend, the option to be toxic is yours alone.
But what you and many others here need to understand is that the game doesn't belong to you.
But unlike you, people who would like an SC know that the game must reach more people. So, both I and the others, we suggest an option to turn the SC on and off, so that you can continue playing like today.
Furthermore, with the possibility of a car breaking down or the driver running on the track directly linked to the driver's experience and the car's unwinding, it is not luck, but a capacity for development.
But as a suggestion, if you don't want to hear about SC, don't go into the topic. After all, we already know your opinion and at least for me it doesn't matter. Unless it's productive!




Oh so it’s because of your suggestion that I can continue playing, and if I don’t like your suggestion I shouldn’t reply because you already know and my opinion doesn’t matter to you.

Thanks a lot, not toxic at all

md-quotelink
medal 5668
61 days ago

Antonio
Pedro

N

Pedro

SC is an excellent way to give a minimal chance of an almost decided race to change.



So basically allow someone else to win by luck and not skill/strategy? You really expect those that have spent countless hours pouring over data to be better managers not to be toxic about that???




So friend, the option to be toxic is yours alone.
But what you and many others here need to understand is that the game doesn't belong to you.
But unlike you, people who would like an SC know that the game must reach more people. So, both I and the others, we suggest an option to turn the SC on and off, so that you can continue playing like today.
Furthermore, with the possibility of a car breaking down or the driver running on the track directly linked to the driver's experience and the car's unwinding, it is not luck, but a capacity for development.
But as a suggestion, if you don't want to hear about SC, don't go into the topic. After all, we already know your opinion and at least for me it doesn't matter. Unless it's productive!




Oh so it’s because of your suggestion that I can continue playing, and if I don’t like your suggestion I shouldn’t reply because you already know and my opinion doesn’t matter to you.

Thanks a lot, not toxic at all



Well, actually what I said was:
If your opinion isn't productive, better not talk.
Any opinion with foundation and education will always be welcome.
The problem is the way some treat people who make the repeated suggestion.
Everyone's intention is to make the game more competitive and fun and this type of treatment does exactly the opposite!


md-quotelink
angle-double-left ios-arrow-back 1 2 ios-arrow-forward angle-double-right

You must be logged in to post a reply.