ios-personmd-notifications md-help-circle

Profile

  • Guest
    medal 0
  • Posts: 21
  • Post Likes: 3765

Notifications

  • No Unread Notifications

Suggested
Reputation Best Ranking

warning
This thread is closed. Threads older than 6 weeks are closed automatically. To continue this discussion, create a new thread.
angle-double-left ios-arrow-back 1 ios-arrow-forward angle-double-right
medal 5000
3 years 298 days ago
Hi!
If the reputation's best ranking is of the old system, many people will have it at 10.000, so it's a feature without sense. It should be taken from the 1st of July, after the update.

Greetings.
md-quotelink
medal 5000
3 years 298 days ago
totally agree👍👍
md-quotelink
medal 5930 Super Mod
3 years 298 days ago

Paolo
Hi!
If the reputation's best ranking is of the old system, many people will have it at 10.000, so it's a feature without sense. It should be taken from the 1st of July, after the update.

Greetings.


The update now means that you can go above 10,000 reputation. The new HoF has removed the reputation ceiling making it possible to get 10,001+ rep. 

md-quotelink
medal 5000
3 years 298 days ago

Connor

Paolo
Hi!
If the reputation's best ranking is of the old system, many people will have it at 10.000, so it's a feature without sense. It should be taken from the 1st of July, after the update.

Greetings.


The update now means that you can go above 10,000 reputation. The new HoF has removed the reputation ceiling making it possible to get 10,001+ rep. 



sorry for my English...
there is no point in making fun of ourselves..
making more than 10,000 is impossible..
To make more than 10000 you should get 83 points per race in a championship that runs every day ... something impossible ...

md-quotelink
medal 5000
3 years 298 days ago
Tottaly agree with Paolo and with Nicola's numbers.. I add a consideration..

Maybe I'm wrong..yesterday was the day where people could gain the bigger number of rep points.. Considering as example liga de leyendas, where a big number of people had 7500 or something close to it..yesterday the winner gained around 60 points..Now that winner has a bigger gap in reputation points with respect to some opponents and so, he should gain less if he wins again..But suppose now 60 every day...

60*30 = 1800.. Suppose 2 championships in one month...+200..2000 points per month.

This means that the maximum that can be obtained in the future (and I'm very optimistic in my opinion) is 7000....7000+2000->9000 and back to 7000... and repeat again etc..

SO, at the moment people that started from 10k can only lose reputation and having 10k in the profile is unfair with respect to people that started playing 2 months ago, for example...
md-quotelink
medal 5000
3 years 298 days ago (Last edited by Andrea L'enigmista 3 years 298 days ago)
totally agree👍👍

I suggest removing the old score.
md-quotelink
medal 5000
3 years 298 days ago
We talked about it here... https://igpmanager.com/forum-thread_4/36752
but someone thought it unfair to reset those statistics ... 😅
md-quotelink
medal 4789 Community Manager
3 years 298 days ago
Hello,

A lot of players during the old Hall of Fame took that as a challenge, the best way to give them merit was to keep that number on the profile, just a number, it isn't a reward. I'm sure you can understand that! (please be less rude Gaetano! I answer with the best intention but sometimes you make things hard with your impoliteness).

The rewards are for the players that reach the top in the following seasons and the current one. Everyone will have an opportunity, but we can't wipe the progress made by the rest of managers just because you want it...
md-quotelink
medal 5000
3 years 298 days ago
José
Hello,

A lot of players during the old Hall of Fame took that as a challenge, the best way to give them merit was to keep that number on the profile, just a number, it isn't a reward. I'm sure you can understand that! (please be less rude Gaetano! I answer with the best intention but sometimes you make things hard with your impoliteness).

The rewards are for the players that reach the top in the following seasons and the current one. Everyone will have an opportunity, but we can't wipe the progress made by the rest of managers just because you want it...



I'm sorry if I seem too rude, but we perceive the game in two totally different ways ... and that "just a number" is offensive to me, that number should give prestige and be proud of it, instead it is a fake... you could create a  new opportunity for a challenge ... instead it's just a number.

Numbers, statistics are important especially in this kind of games.
md-quotelink
medal 5000
3 years 298 days ago

José
Hello,

A lot of players during the old Hall of Fame took that as a challenge, the best way to give them merit was to keep that number on the profile, just a number, it isn't a reward. I'm sure you can understand that! (please be less rude Gaetano! I answer with the best intention but sometimes you make things hard with your impoliteness).

The rewards are for the players that reach the top in the following seasons and the current one. Everyone will have an opportunity, but we can't wipe the progress made by the rest of managers just because you want it...



Thank you for your answer! Really appreciated. 

But no, I don't understand the sense of your thought, it doesn't make sense, at all. In the old HoF almost everyone was at 10.000. The good thing of the new HoF should be to have a difference between managers and between every months performance. 
The highest reputation achieved from now should be a goal, not the old, where, as I said, was easy to raise.
md-quotelink
medal 4789 Community Manager
3 years 298 days ago

Paolo

José
Hello,

A lot of players during the old Hall of Fame took that as a challenge, the best way to give them merit was to keep that number on the profile, just a number, it isn't a reward. I'm sure you can understand that! (please be less rude Gaetano! I answer with the best intention but sometimes you make things hard with your impoliteness).

The rewards are for the players that reach the top in the following seasons and the current one. Everyone will have an opportunity, but we can't wipe the progress made by the rest of managers just because you want it...



Thank you for your answer! Really appreciated. 

But no, I don't understand the sense of your thought, it doesn't make sense, at all. In the old HoF almost everyone was at 10.000. The good thing of the new HoF should be to have a difference between managers and between every months performance. 
The highest reputation achieved from now should be a goal, not the old, where, as I said, was easy to raise.


Hello,


We’ll consider this possibility as I said. Thank you!
md-quotelink
medal 5018
3 years 298 days ago

José
Hello,

A lot of players during the old Hall of Fame took that as a challenge, the best way to give them merit was to keep that number on the profile, just a number, it isn't a reward. I'm sure you can understand that! (please be less rude Gaetano! I answer with the best intention but sometimes you make things hard with your impoliteness).

The rewards are for the players that reach the top in the following seasons and the current one. Everyone will have an opportunity, but we can't wipe the progress made by the rest of managers just because you want it...



I saw it as a challenge, as Well and now the 10 000 is gone because i have been less active the last couple of months, so where are my 10 000?

You should make a equal system for everyone
md-quotelink
medal 5000
3 years 297 days ago
I always knew that the old hall of fame was useless because most players with 10k points on reputation played in extremely easy leagues.


The new ranking is much more important than the old ranking.
md-quotelink
medal 5018
3 years 297 days ago

Andrea
I always knew that the old hall of fame was useless because most players with 10k points on reputation played in extremely easy leagues.


The new ranking is much more important than the old ranking.


Thats the annoying point about the highest Reputation achieved.

It is impossible to reach a higher rep than 9000 now.
I would beat 90% of the 10 000 managers without any problems and it looks like i never reached it. Same for a couple of other managers in my league who were at 10000 like me and would really deserve it.
The new highest rep is even more misleading than the old 10000 rep.
md-quotelink
angle-double-left ios-arrow-back 1 ios-arrow-forward angle-double-right

You must be logged in to post a reply.