Suggested

Reputation calculation changes

First of all, I congratulate William on P1.
I think his reasoning is absolutely correct and I try to explain some more reasons than he reported.
1. Assuming that William continues to make the same results in the same league, the rep gain would be increasingly reduced, because his and especially his opponents' rep would be reduced.
2. William and Bastian did an excellent performance because they are two wonderful managers who are in two of the most competitive leagues in the game; if the difference in rep between the leagues tends to be more and more reduced over time, those who participate in less competitive leagues will tend to obtain better performances in the HoF because they can win all the races, which instead cannot happen in the most competitive leagues.

Leaving this discussion aside, I would like that leagues that play 4 or 5 races per week could also participate in the HoF competition. In this regard, I proposed that the rep earned for each race be multiplied by (7 / n), where n is the number of races scheduled each week. In this way, assuming that a manager wins all 5 weekly races, with the same league rep, he would always take the same final rep as the winner in a league with 7 scheduled races.

I understand very well that iGP wants to reward those who can play every day. But I think there are other ways to reward them. For example, you could give 3 tokens per race to those who make 6 or 7 races, 2 tokens to those who make 4 or 5, and 1 token to those who make less. In this way, or in other similar ways, those who play more are rewarded but everyone is allowed to participate in the HoF competition.