Jack
Atrophy is not an isolated feature. It came with about 5 other features and is a critical part of balancing them. Remove atrophy: nobody needs to train a driver, ever. The end.
What was there before? Previously, star ratings and levels were capped to the manager level. As you progressed drivers/staff would lose stars, and you had to train them up again every time you levelled up to regain 5 stars or replace staff. Drivers also couldn't be competitive across manager levels (level 10 had 0 chance against level 30 for example). Now, you don't need to replace staff, drivers at all levels are competitive and everyone has the same choice (train or go to the market), effective at the same moment, so it's fairer in almost every way.
I understand that it feels different to the old system though, and it triggers a greater sense of loss aversion ("where did my level go? that's not fair!" - a perfectly normal reaction, really), but I think it needs a round of balancing where it is higher on younger drivers and lessened on older drivers to match their training rate. If we remove it, it has to be replaced with a completely different system altogether, otherwise, you get the problem I outlined with the opening sentence.
I’m sorry Jack, but I have to disagree on this one. While I understand the need of atrophy to incentivize high level people to keep training their drivers, it is
hugely unbalanced and it negatively affects lower level managers. The more established teams have more funds to maybe just buy new drivers. Low levels don’t. Also
it makes drivers from the academy USELESS.
Either activate atrophy just for level 40 managers, or make it that atrophy starts at drivers age 30, or make it 1% or
2% AT VERY MAX in every stat.
I would propose
2% starting from age 26. Drivers till 25 years old are too young to get atrophy (think about the academy).
Currently it is just frustrating everyone. And the poll clearly shows it. If it was good you’d have few people saying yes.
On this one
you have to listen to the community.