ios-person md-notifications md-help-circle

Profile

Guest
medal 0
Posts: 21
Post Likes: 3765

Notifications

No Unread Notifications

Rejected
Rechargeable ERS

ERS or KERS

52.63% (30)	ERS
47.37% (27)	KERS

warning

This thread is closed. Threads older than 6 weeks are closed automatically. To continue this discussion, create a new thread.

Timothy Barry
2 years 351 days ago

Luca

Timothy

Luca

Timothy

Luca

Timothy

Luca

I think we should have ERS instead of KERS. This would mean it is rechargeable. This would mean more strategy options, such as slowing at the end of a straight to regain charge. I think this would create closer more exciting races, rather than just holding down a button, for the last lap, as everyone does with KERS.

I think it would add more point to attend races

My opinion is that I cannot vote on this, considering that both options are, actually, exactly the same. They are both energy RECOVERY systems, one is just specific to Kenetic energy recovery.

What we actually have in our cars, now is a basic Battery Boost System (BBS), without the ability to use energy recovery to recharge the batteries. The level of boost, dictates the battery storage capacity and electric motor tech level.

In my opinion, you should redo the vote to be: -

BBS vs. ERS/KERS

The vote is about changing it to a system similar to F1 where the battery recharges under braking.

What I am saying is that both options given are the same, exactly. They both involve recharging the battery, where the in game system is just a battery powering electric motors, where there is no recharging system for the batteries. Ergo the voting options are fundamentally, exactly the same thing...

Well KERS at the moment is not rechargeable, ERS would be rechargeable

Right...

ERS and KERS are BOTH rechargable systems!!!
They are both Energy Recovery Systems, that use waste energy to recharge a battery. Ergo they are both not used in the game and the real question is: -

Do we want a KERS/ERS system or the current BBS (Battery Boost System) that does not recharge the battery in any way.

That is my point...

The energy system in the game is called KERS, and is not rechargeable. I am asking for ERS like in F1 which recharges under braking. I think you are a bit confused at the moment

No. It is called Boost. Just look in your tech centre. All the players call it KERS, even me at times. But it is not that, otherwise what you want is already in the game...

Connor Cooper Super Mod
2 years 351 days ago

Luca

Timothy

Luca

Timothy

Luca

Timothy

Luca

I think we should have ERS instead of KERS. This would mean it is rechargeable. This would mean more strategy options, such as slowing at the end of a straight to regain charge. I think this would create closer more exciting races, rather than just holding down a button, for the last lap, as everyone does with KERS.

I think it would add more point to attend races

My opinion is that I cannot vote on this, considering that both options are, actually, exactly the same. They are both energy RECOVERY systems, one is just specific to Kenetic energy recovery.

What we actually have in our cars, now is a basic Battery Boost System (BBS), without the ability to use energy recovery to recharge the batteries. The level of boost, dictates the battery storage capacity and electric motor tech level.

In my opinion, you should redo the vote to be: -

BBS vs. ERS/KERS

The vote is about changing it to a system similar to F1 where the battery recharges under braking.

What I am saying is that both options given are the same, exactly. They both involve recharging the battery, where the in game system is just a battery powering electric motors, where there is no recharging system for the batteries. Ergo the voting options are fundamentally, exactly the same thing...

Well KERS at the moment is not rechargeable, ERS would be rechargeable

Right...

ERS and KERS are BOTH rechargable systems!!!
They are both Energy Recovery Systems, that use waste energy to recharge a battery. Ergo they are both not used in the game and the real question is: -

Do we want a KERS/ERS system or the current BBS (Battery Boost System) that does not recharge the battery in any way.

That is my point...

The energy system in the game is called KERS, and is not rechargeable. I am asking for ERS like in F1 which recharges under braking. I think you are a bit confused at the moment

Hello,

The energy system in this game is actually called "boost" - but people call it KERS.

However, iGP uses boost, KERS/ERS are rechargable energy systems which 'recycle' waste energy.

If you wanted another POV, you could describe iGP Manager's speed booster as 'push to pass'.

Rémy Gomes
2 years 351 days ago

Titan

Rémy

Stuffy

ERS is KERS, it just removes the K (Kinetic) from the rest (Energy Recovery System) I assume your asking for KERS/ERS to be rechargeable in which case I disagree. Rechargeable batterys make it less strategic and more routine, almost like push levels (using pl5 in corners, pl1 in straights etc) You would end up using your supplied amount in the same place each lap.

make the qualification and make the kers usable in quali ,
and start the race with the remaining percentage
it brings a lot more strategy

What about people who can't get there in time?

Also, using KERS in quali would be useless, you are all bunched up at the start regerdless of how much you use.

normal qualification "Also, using KERS in quali would be useless " in your pov but this is false / in monaco it can be useful and many other track , if you are not here its your buisness 🤣 there are plenty of ways to integrate the qualifiers into the games , just because you don't like the idea that the idea is bad for the game doesn't mean you don't want to always ask your league host to turn it off

Dortmund Simp
2 years 351 days ago

Timothy

Luca

Timothy

Luca

Timothy

Luca

Timothy

Luca

I think we should have ERS instead of KERS. This would mean it is rechargeable. This would mean more strategy options, such as slowing at the end of a straight to regain charge. I think this would create closer more exciting races, rather than just holding down a button, for the last lap, as everyone does with KERS.

I think it would add more point to attend races

My opinion is that I cannot vote on this, considering that both options are, actually, exactly the same. They are both energy RECOVERY systems, one is just specific to Kenetic energy recovery.

What we actually have in our cars, now is a basic Battery Boost System (BBS), without the ability to use energy recovery to recharge the batteries. The level of boost, dictates the battery storage capacity and electric motor tech level.

In my opinion, you should redo the vote to be: -

BBS vs. ERS/KERS

The vote is about changing it to a system similar to F1 where the battery recharges under braking.

What I am saying is that both options given are the same, exactly. They both involve recharging the battery, where the in game system is just a battery powering electric motors, where there is no recharging system for the batteries. Ergo the voting options are fundamentally, exactly the same thing...

Well KERS at the moment is not rechargeable, ERS would be rechargeable

Right...

ERS and KERS are BOTH rechargable systems!!!
They are both Energy Recovery Systems, that use waste energy to recharge a battery. Ergo they are both not used in the game and the real question is: -

Do we want a KERS/ERS system or the current BBS (Battery Boost System) that does not recharge the battery in any way.

That is my point...

The energy system in the game is called KERS, and is not rechargeable. I am asking for ERS like in F1 which recharges under braking. I think you are a bit confused at the moment

No. It is called Boost. Just look in your tech centre. All the players call it KERS, even me at times. But it is not that, otherwise what you want is already in the game...

If you call it KERS, then figure out what I mean by KERS in the poll!

Timothy Barry
2 years 351 days ago

Luca

Timothy

Luca

Timothy

Luca

Timothy

Luca

Timothy

Luca

I think we should have ERS instead of KERS. This would mean it is rechargeable. This would mean more strategy options, such as slowing at the end of a straight to regain charge. I think this would create closer more exciting races, rather than just holding down a button, for the last lap, as everyone does with KERS.

I think it would add more point to attend races

My opinion is that I cannot vote on this, considering that both options are, actually, exactly the same. They are both energy RECOVERY systems, one is just specific to Kenetic energy recovery.

What we actually have in our cars, now is a basic Battery Boost System (BBS), without the ability to use energy recovery to recharge the batteries. The level of boost, dictates the battery storage capacity and electric motor tech level.

In my opinion, you should redo the vote to be: -

BBS vs. ERS/KERS

The vote is about changing it to a system similar to F1 where the battery recharges under braking.

What I am saying is that both options given are the same, exactly. They both involve recharging the battery, where the in game system is just a battery powering electric motors, where there is no recharging system for the batteries. Ergo the voting options are fundamentally, exactly the same thing...

Well KERS at the moment is not rechargeable, ERS would be rechargeable

Right...

ERS and KERS are BOTH rechargable systems!!!
They are both Energy Recovery Systems, that use waste energy to recharge a battery. Ergo they are both not used in the game and the real question is: -

Do we want a KERS/ERS system or the current BBS (Battery Boost System) that does not recharge the battery in any way.

That is my point...

The energy system in the game is called KERS, and is not rechargeable. I am asking for ERS like in F1 which recharges under braking. I think you are a bit confused at the moment

No. It is called Boost. Just look in your tech centre. All the players call it KERS, even me at times. But it is not that, otherwise what you want is already in the game...

If you call it KERS, then figure out what I mean by KERS in the poll!

Nope. Cos KERS and ERS are the same thing that are not boost...

Dortmund Simp
2 years 351 days ago

Timothy

Luca

Timothy

Luca

Timothy

Luca

Timothy

Luca

Timothy

Luca

I think we should have ERS instead of KERS. This would mean it is rechargeable. This would mean more strategy options, such as slowing at the end of a straight to regain charge. I think this would create closer more exciting races, rather than just holding down a button, for the last lap, as everyone does with KERS.

I think it would add more point to attend races

My opinion is that I cannot vote on this, considering that both options are, actually, exactly the same. They are both energy RECOVERY systems, one is just specific to Kenetic energy recovery.

What we actually have in our cars, now is a basic Battery Boost System (BBS), without the ability to use energy recovery to recharge the batteries. The level of boost, dictates the battery storage capacity and electric motor tech level.

In my opinion, you should redo the vote to be: -

BBS vs. ERS/KERS

The vote is about changing it to a system similar to F1 where the battery recharges under braking.

What I am saying is that both options given are the same, exactly. They both involve recharging the battery, where the in game system is just a battery powering electric motors, where there is no recharging system for the batteries. Ergo the voting options are fundamentally, exactly the same thing...

Well KERS at the moment is not rechargeable, ERS would be rechargeable

Right...

ERS and KERS are BOTH rechargable systems!!!
They are both Energy Recovery Systems, that use waste energy to recharge a battery. Ergo they are both not used in the game and the real question is: -

Do we want a KERS/ERS system or the current BBS (Battery Boost System) that does not recharge the battery in any way.

That is my point...

The energy system in the game is called KERS, and is not rechargeable. I am asking for ERS like in F1 which recharges under braking. I think you are a bit confused at the moment

No. It is called Boost. Just look in your tech centre. All the players call it KERS, even me at times. But it is not that, otherwise what you want is already in the game...

If you call it KERS, then figure out what I mean by KERS in the poll!

Nope. Cos KERS and ERS are the same thing that are not boost...

No... KERS has less power less deployment as ERS

Timothy Barry
2 years 351 days ago

Luca

Timothy

Luca

Timothy

Luca

Timothy

Luca

Timothy

Luca

Timothy

Luca

I think we should have ERS instead of KERS. This would mean it is rechargeable. This would mean more strategy options, such as slowing at the end of a straight to regain charge. I think this would create closer more exciting races, rather than just holding down a button, for the last lap, as everyone does with KERS.

I think it would add more point to attend races

My opinion is that I cannot vote on this, considering that both options are, actually, exactly the same. They are both energy RECOVERY systems, one is just specific to Kenetic energy recovery.

What we actually have in our cars, now is a basic Battery Boost System (BBS), without the ability to use energy recovery to recharge the batteries. The level of boost, dictates the battery storage capacity and electric motor tech level.

In my opinion, you should redo the vote to be: -

BBS vs. ERS/KERS

The vote is about changing it to a system similar to F1 where the battery recharges under braking.

What I am saying is that both options given are the same, exactly. They both involve recharging the battery, where the in game system is just a battery powering electric motors, where there is no recharging system for the batteries. Ergo the voting options are fundamentally, exactly the same thing...

Well KERS at the moment is not rechargeable, ERS would be rechargeable

Right...

ERS and KERS are BOTH rechargable systems!!!
They are both Energy Recovery Systems, that use waste energy to recharge a battery. Ergo they are both not used in the game and the real question is: -

Do we want a KERS/ERS system or the current BBS (Battery Boost System) that does not recharge the battery in any way.

That is my point...

The energy system in the game is called KERS, and is not rechargeable. I am asking for ERS like in F1 which recharges under braking. I think you are a bit confused at the moment

No. It is called Boost. Just look in your tech centre. All the players call it KERS, even me at times. But it is not that, otherwise what you want is already in the game...

If you call it KERS, then figure out what I mean by KERS in the poll!

Nope. Cos KERS and ERS are the same thing that are not boost...

No... KERS has less power less deployment as ERS

No.

They are exactly the same. If there is a difference then that is that KERS, uses the unused energy that the Work of moving things does not use and is a specific form of ERS.
A boost system is limited and non rechargable, in race. Such as the use of non rechargable batteries or a NOS system.

Trust me in the following assertion....

You need to change the vote to make it less confusing.

Trust me in this due to the fact that I am educated to a high level in Engineering!

Kevin Bissell Super Mod
2 years 351 days ago

If you're responding to the previous post, is there really any need to use the quote? This is getting ridiculous, an enormously long quote followed by a single sentence reply.

Timothy is correct, the poll is asking to choose between two rechargeable systems so there is no option to vote for the current system. Almost everywhere in the game the current system is referred to as Boost but some of the managers who have played this game for a long time use the term KERS because IIRC that was what it used to be called in the pre - Aug 2016 version of the game, even though technically this was incorrect as it has never been rechargeable in iGP.

The only place I see mention of KERS is in the "Rules & Regulations"...

Timothy Barry
2 years 351 days ago

Sorry Kevin, for my part. And thanks for the support

Dortmund Simp
2 years 350 days ago

By KERS I mean the current system, OK

Rémy Gomes
2 years 350 days ago

Luca

By KERS I mean the current system, OK

YOU can disable ppl DRS with it 🤣 this is pure GOLD

Dortmund Simp
2 years 350 days ago

Rémy

Luca

By KERS I mean the current system, OK

YOU can disable ppl DRS with it 🤣 this is pure GOLD

wut

Timothy Barry
2 years 350 days ago

RIGHT!!!

The current system IS NOT called KERS!!!

it IS CALLED Boost!!!

This both can and will confuse people. It does not matter a monkeys, what you say about it, simply because that may be what people call it. The FACT is that ERS and KERS are EXACTLY THE SAME THING!!! Boost is what we already have, as Mr. Bissell has already stated.

So, pretty please with sprinkles on...

Change your vote as to capture the meanings within the game. Not the neanings that the players use. Devs may not understand what you want...

Dortmund Simp
2 years 350 days ago

Timothy

RIGHT!!!

The current system IS NOT called KERS!!!

it IS CALLED Boost!!!

This both can and will confuse people. It does not matter a monkeys, what you say about it, simply because that may be what people call it. The FACT is that ERS and KERS are EXACTLY THE SAME THING!!! Boost is what we already have, as Mr. Bissell has already stated.

So, pretty please with sprinkles on...

Change your vote as to capture the meanings within the game. Not the neanings that the players use. Devs may not understand what you want...

I can't change the poll, and also I have explained it enough in the page.

P.S. lovely sarcasm

Timothy Barry
2 years 350 days ago

You could, if you were to ask the mods to reject this idea and start from scratch...

Dortmund Simp
2 years 350 days ago

Ok, mods please close this forum page. Here is the new one
https://igpmanager.com/forum-thread/44682

You must be logged in to post a reply.