Big problem is we dont know if offline teams tyres are overheating or stone cold there is currently no way of knowing. There might be a bug in system that keeps them in optimal operating range no body knows.
I dont know if it is possible for you to see the times of that race. However, I will post the lap times below.
P.Papadopoulos
Lap 60: Supersoft tyres - 1.25.987 - 47% Tyre life - 6.9 Litres of fuel
M.Smith
Lap 60: Supersoft tyres - 1.25.714 - 47% Tyre life - 6.9 Litres of fuel
L.Jones
Lap 59: Medium Tyres - 1.25.960 - Tyre life should be 70% - 2 more laps of fuel
The fastest lap time are, like you said 1.21 and 1.23 but that's why I used 41% of KERS in one lap. (Lap 71 for P.Pap) and Lap 77 for M.Smith, which as you can see I pitted him again (Lap 75) for a brand new SS with 3 laps to go.
The fact remains. He is very close to my time.
Again Lap 17:
M.Smith 1.28.195 Tyres 83% Fuel 24.8 Soft tyres
P.Pap 1.28.784 Tyres 80% Fuel 21.7 Soft Tyres
L.Jones 1.28.163 And he was closing the gap from lap 12 (+8 secs) to Lap 19 (+1.743 secs).
If the mediums are that close to soft tyres or even the super softs then I guess there is no use to put S or SS tyres. Just put mediums and low fuel load with Normal push level. This is ridiculous! And if the Mediums can compete with the Super softs with low fuel load, then I guess there is no need for a soft tyre compound.
would like to think it's ok, the length of stint, the fuel load, the weather, the car & the drivers it all plays a part. only tyres that are iffy are hards and supers, SS dont have enough life and H have too much life.
Not too many people though would be using Med & Hard at monaco lol
I saw similar in my rookie season 1, where medium tires were as fast or faster than softer tires and was told to consider all sorts of factors (which I did and still had no acceptable answer). I still think medium tires have a quirk in them.