Suggested

Change qualifying

To then go straight into the wall as the track decided it's a nice spot for a decent corner but the same formula also applied to Braking where some of that added Acceleration came from, so to not do that or loose time braking way earlier you actually need to add some more points to Braking as well instead taking away, just to loose your car in the corner as mass applies there as well, so you also need more Downforce, not less... In the end you would have to add everywhere and can't remove points anywhere so everyone is just stuck the same with or without more fuel, just with slower lap times due to weight.


As said, of course you need to catch the train, but not being too much to the front is better for a heavy car as on the front the risk is high, with potentially dirty air effect, to end up having a gap after the first 2.x laps to first DRS, either having to waste lots of boost to still gain it or risk being the reason of the train splitting and the locomotive speeding away. Of course the further back the higher the risk being in the wrong train if someone else causes a split. 

SuperSofts outqualify Softs already anyway, the added fuel in a Soft car doesn't change anything there. Also all those Supers find they may end up in the back if not going a bit lighter, means shortening a stint on a tyre often running a bit painfully short on life to be optimal for a given strategy in the first place. So I'd understand if the worries are more about people would just tend even more to just use Softs. But then using Supers opens chances again, especially as to Qualify to the front of the Softs pack people would've to run lighter than they used to and thus less range drawback by using Supers. Then there's going Medium, as weight kills Quali anyway and thus those extending their Soft stint won't fare much better on the grid, while those light Soft cars, as the Supers, often compromise and have to repay the lap debt later.